Technology Developer
|
AS-i Consortium |
| Year Introduced |
1993 |
| Openness |
Multiple vendors
800+ products, 150 Vendors |
| Type of Network |
Sensor Bus |
| Physical Media |
2-wire cable (flat or round) |
| Network Topology |
Bus, Ring, Tree, Star |
| Maximum Devices |
|
|
|
31 nodes (or 248 I/O points) |
|
|
62 nodes (or 434 I/O points) |
| Maximum Distance |
|
|
|
100 meters |
| - |
Maximum Distance with repeaters
(max. of 2 repeaters can be used) |
|
300 meters |
| Communication Methods |
| - |
Master/Slave with cyclic polling |
| - |
Manchester Bit Encoding implemented via Alternating Pulse Modulation (APM) |
|
| Transmission Properties |
5 mSec latency max. on fully loaded segment |
| Primary usage |
|
|
|
Discrete Signals |
|
|
Discrete Signals (supports 12 bit analog signals accessed over 5 cycles) |
| Power and Communications on same twisted pair |
| - |
Limited to 200mA per device power consumption |
| - |
Requires AS-i specific power supply on communications bus for de-coupling |
|
| Device Power Supply |
| - |
Devices can be supplied from bus (<200mA) |
| - |
Additional power can be supplied by AS-i power bus cable having multiple power supplies (required for higher power outputs) |
|
| Wiring Types |
|
| Round: |
Normal 2 wire cable
#16AWG (1.5mm) |
| Flat: |
2 wire flat AS-i cable
(1.5mm conductors)
Yellow for communications
Black for additional power |
| Grounding aspects |
Ungrounded communications bus |
| Shielding |
Unshielded wire |
| Terminators |
No terminators required |
| Hazardous Area Installations |
Explosion Proof wiring required |
| Device Addressing |
Automatic when connected one at a time to the segment or with Handheld Addressing Unit |
| Governing Body |
ATO (AS-i Trade Organization) |
| Website |
www.as-interface.com |
|
|
| Conventional I/O System |
ASi Bus Network |
Advantages
|
Advantages
|
| Technology is already understood |
Technology is easy to understand |
| Slightly lower device cost |
Very low device cost adder |
| Independent wiring from devices to the control system means wiring problems with one device don’t affect other field devices |
Lower installed cost |
Drawbacks
|
High speed network for sensor level devices |
| Higher installed cost |
Ability to integrate conventional devices into AS-i network |
| Point-to-point wiring is expensive |
Easy addressing for devices; auto-addressing capabilities on most masters |
Many wiring connections:
| - |
are labor intensive to install |
| - |
create many points of failure |
| - |
increase complexity when troubleshooting |
| - |
require large amounts of cabinet or rack space for installation of terminal blocks |
| - |
create time-consuming initial checkout and startup |
|
Many gateways available to integrate AS-i network into higher-level networks, allowing for easy integration of a lower cost, sensor level network with a more sophisticated, higher-cost control level network |
Expansion requires duplicating the entire wiring scheme for each additional point
|
AS-i network provides for use of higher power devices |
|
Easily expandable with network redesign |
|
Requires no terminators or special shielding requirements yet still less susceptible to RFI interface than some networks |
|
Wide variety of masters/gateways available for PLC’s, DCS’s, PC’s |
|
Power and bus communications are on same pair of wires |
|
Wide variety of topologies available, including point-to-point, line, tree, and ring |
|
Drawbacks
|
|
Not available for Intrinsically Safe applications |
|
Wiring runs limited to 100 meters |
|
v2.0 supports only discrete devices (v2.1 has limited analog support) |
|
No control in the field |
|
Limited data quality and status messaging |
|
Limited analog support |
|
Requires specific AS-i power supply for bus communications isolation |
|
Limited redundancy capabilities |